Introduction
Every generation of mobile communication begins with a bold vision and culminates in a global standard that brings that vision to life. Today, we are standing at the threshold of the next great leap: 6G (officially designated by ITU-R as IMT-2030). While 6G might still feel like science fiction, the critical framework that will define it is being built right now.
This article provides an overview of the current trends in 6G technology standardization at ITU-R, with a focus on the recently developed 6G requirements and evaluation methodologies, and on how Samsung is leading the orchestra to make 6G a reality by 2030.
Understanding the Global 6G Standardization Ecosystem: ITU-R and 3GPP
The global standardization of 6G is a massive undertaking aimed at formalizing new technologies for worldwide commercialization. This intricate journey is driven by the seamless collaboration between two fundamental organizations: the ITU-R and 3GPP. Understanding their distinct but complementary roles is essential to grasping the big picture of 6G standardization.
For those unfamiliar with how global technology standards are made, the relationship between the two main organizations can be easily understood through a simple metaphor: the Architect and the Builder.
·
ITU-R (The Architect): The International Telecommunication Union Radiocommunication Sector (ITU-R) is a specialized agency of the United Nations. Within it, Working Party 5D (WP 5D) is responsible for defining the overall framework (or vision) for the next generation of International Mobile Telecommunications (IMT), establishing the official approval timeline, setting the minimum requirements, and creating the methodologies by which candidate technologies will be evaluated.
·
3GPP (The Builder): Acting on the ITU-R’s guidance, 3GPP formally initiates 6G technology research (beginning in June 2025). Its mission is to design and develop the actual mobile communication specifications capable of meeting the ITU-R’s stringent 6G requirements. 3GPP will complete these detailed specifications by 2029 and submit them to the ITU-R as the primary 6G candidate technology.
Once 3GPP and other global proponents submit their candidate technologies, the ITU-R rigorously evaluates them and grants official approval to the technologies that pass the evaluation criteria as the unified global 6G standard by June 2030.
Figure 1. Collaboration framework between ITU-R and 3GPP for 6G Standardization
Charting the Course to 6G: The IMT-2030 Development Roadmap
ITU-R WP 5D has laid out a highly structured, four-stage roadmap to guide the industry from concept to commercial reality by 2030:
·
Stage 1 — Defining the “Framework (Vision)” (Completed in June 2023): ITU-R published Recommendation ITU-R M.2160 [1], establishing the overall framework, six representative usage scenarios, and 15 key capabilities of IMT-2030.
·
Stage 2 — Establishing Technical and Procedural Foundations (Current Phase): This is where the high-level framework is translated into concrete, verifiable numbers. This phase establishes the minimum Technical Performance Requirements (TPRs) and Evaluation Guidelines—essentially creating the "entrance exam" and the "grading rubric" for 6G.
·
Stage 3 — Submission & Evaluation (February 2027 – October 2029): Global standards bodies (like 3GPP) submit their candidate technologies, which are then rigorously evaluated by independent evaluation groups.
·
Stage 4 — Final Decision & Specification (Concluding by June 2030): The final, detailed global specifications are compiled and officially published, paving the way for commercial 6G networks.
Figure 2. ITU-R WP 5D timeline for the development of IMT-2030 specifications
Six Usage Scenarios Shaping Our Future Life with 6G
What will 6G actually do for us? In Stage 1, the ITU-R identified six usage scenarios. Rather than looking at them as dry technical categories, let’s explore how they will transform our daily lives:
1.
Immersive Communication (IC): This usage scenario extends the enhanced Mobile Broadband (eMBB) of IMT-2020 and covers use cases which provide a rich and interactive video (immersive) experience to users, including the interactions with machine interfaces.
2.
Hyper-Reliable and Low-Latency Communication (HRLLC): This usage scenario extends the Ultra-Reliable and Low-Latency Communication (URLLC) of IMT-2020 and covers specialized use cases that are expected to have more stringent requirements on reliability and latency.
3.
Massive Communication (MC): This usage scenario extends massive Machine Type Communication (mMTC) of IMT-2020 and involves connection of massive number of devices or sensors for a wide range of use cases and applications.
4.
Ubiquitous Connectivity (UC): This usage scenario is intended to enhance connectivity with the aim to bridge the digital divide.
5.
Artificial Intelligence and Communication (AIAC): This usage scenario would support distributed computing and AI applications.
6.
Integrated Sensing and Communication (ISAC): This usage scenario facilitates new applications and services that require sensing capabilities.
The 6G “Entrance Exam”
Minimum Technical Performance Requirements (TPRs)
To ensure that candidate technologies can actually deliver on these six scenarios, ITU-R completed the draft new report for 6G TPRs in February 2026 [2]. If we compare this to an entrance exam, the candidate technologies must achieve or exceed these target values to be officially recognized as 6G. The requirements are split into two categories:
·
Evolution from 5G (14 Enhanced Metrics): To support expanded services, all 14 legacy 5G TPRs [3] are inherited, with many featuring higher target values to deliver enhanced performance: theoretical peak data rate, 5th percentile user data rate, peak spectral efficiency, average spectral efficiency, 5th percentile user spectral efficiency, area traffic capacity, connection density, mobility, mobility interruption time, user plane latency, control plane latency, reliability, bandwidth, and energy efficiency for sustainability.
·
Brand-New Requirements for 6G (6 New Metrics): To support newly emerging services like eXtended Reality (XR) and AI/Sensing applications, six new TPRs are defined: composite requirements, positioning accuracy, sensing-related requirements, AI-related requirements, resilience and extended connectivity, and link distance.
Table 1 outlines the complete set of 20 TPR items established for IMT-2030.
Table 1. Summary of IMT-2030 Technical Performance Requirements (TPRs)
-
NOTE 1: Spectral efficiency and mobility should be evaluated using at least one of configuration A, B or C. Configuration D is highly encouraged to be evaluated. If configuration D is evaluated, the proponents should report the evaluation results.
-
NOTE 2: The applicability of vertical localization accuracy depends on the type of sensing target.
Assessing the Candidate Technologies: Evaluation Guidelines
Having an exam paper (TPRs) is only useful if you have a fair, objective way to grade it. For this purpose, in June 2026, WP 5D finalized another critical milestone: the draft new report on 6G evaluation guidelines [4]. These guidelines outline how independent evaluation groups and technology proponents must assess candidate technologies to prove they meet the minimum requirements.
The Three High-level Assessment Methods
Instead of relying on a single assessment, the evaluation utilizes three complementary approaches depending on the requirement:
1.
Simulation: System-level and link-level simulations to model real-world network performance.
2.
Analytical: Mathematical analysis and calculations.
3.
Inspection: Review of the functionality and parameterization of the proposal.
Table 2 outlines the high-level assessment method for each minimum requirement.
Table 2. Summary of Evaluation Methodologies
-
NOTE 3: Information on link distance for specific data rates is provided in the description template using link budget tables as defined in Report ITU-R M.[IMT-2030.SUBMISSION] for Rural-IC and Dense Urban-IC test environments.
Real-world Assessing Grounds: The 7 Test Environments
To make sure the simulations reflect the real world, the evaluation report defines seven representative test environments. These act as standardized virtual playgrounds where every technology is assessed under the exact same conditions:
·
Indoor Hotspot-IC: An indoor isolated environment at offices and/or in shopping malls based on stationary and pedestrian users with very high user density.
·
Dense Urban-IC: An urban environment with high user density and traffic loads focusing on pedestrian and vehicular users.
·
Rural-IC: A rural environment with continuous wide area coverage, supporting pedestrian, vehicular and high-speed vehicular users.
·
Urban Macro–MC: An urban macro environment with continuous coverage focusing on a high number of connected machine type devices.
·
Indoor Factory–HRLLC: An indoor isolated environment at factory halls (indoor factory environment) focusing on hyper-reliable and low latency communications.
·
Indoor Factory–ISAC: An indoor isolated environment at factory halls (indoor factory environment) focusing on positioning of connected devices and sensing of unconnected objects.
·
Urban Macro-ISAC: An urban macro environment focusing on positioning of connected devices and sensing of unconnected objects.
Table 3 shows the mapping of usage scenarios and test environments.
Table 3. Mapping of Usage Scenarios and Test Environments
Orchestrating the Global 6G Effort: Samsung’s Leadership
Standardizing a technology that will connect billions of people and devices requires massive global consensus. Dozens of nations and hundreds of tech companies must agree on every single detail. Who ensures this colossal machine runs smoothly?
Within ITU-R WP 5D, this critical role falls upon the Sub-Working Group on Coordination (SWG Coordination). This pivotal group is responsible for managing the entire process, from resolving technical disagreements to finalizing the crucial remaining components:
·
The Submission Template Report [5]: The formal application document that candidate technologies must use.
·
The Process Document [6]: The master schedule and rules for how technology submission, evaluation, and consensus-building will proceed.
Samsung is currently leading this vital effort as the Chair of SWG Coordination (Chair: Hyunjoong Lee, Staff Engineer at Samsung Research). Under Samsung's leadership, the group is bridging the gap between ITU-R, industry proponents like 3GPP, and independent evaluation groups. This leadership role is a testament to Samsung's technical expertise and its trusted standing as an objective, unifying voice in the global wireless industry.
Conclusion: The Road to 2030
With the completion of the TPR and Evaluation reports, the industry now has a rock-solid, objective yardstick to define what is—and what isn’t—true 6G. The journey ahead is structured and clear:
·
Late 2026: Official publication of the Stage 2 TPR and Evaluation reports.
·
February 2027 – February 2029: Global bodies, led by 3GPP, will officially submit their proposed technologies.
·
June 2029 – June 2030: Final consensus-building and the official release of the unified IMT-2030 technical specifications.
While we are still in the early stages, the critical groundwork is complete. As the chair of the coordination group, Samsung remains deeply committed to guiding the global community along this path, ensuring that when 2030 arrives, the world is ready to step into a seamless, hyper-connected, and truly intelligent 6G future.
References
[1] Recommendation ITU-R M.2160, "Framework and overall objectives of the future development of IMT for 2030 and beyond," November 2023.
[2] Document 5/116, Draft New Report ITU-R M.[IMT-2030.TECH PERF REQ], "Minimum requirements related to technical performance for IMT-2030 radio interface(s)," February 2026.
[3] Report ITU-R M.2410, "Minimum requirements related to technical performance for IMT-2020 radio interface(s)," November 2017.
[4] Document 5/119, Draft New Report ITU-R M.[IMT-2030.EVAL], "Guidelines for evaluation of radio interface technologies for IMT-2030," June 2026.
[5] Annex 5.5 to Working Party 5D Chair’s Report (Document 5D/1394), Preliminary Draft New Report ITU-R M.[IMT-2030.SUBMISSION], "Requirements, evaluation criteria and submission templates for the development of IMT-2030," June 2026.
[6] Annex 5.4 to Working Party 5D Chair’s Report (Document 5D/1394), Working Document towards a Preliminary Draft Revision of Document IMT-2030/2, "Submission, evaluation process and consensus building for IMT-2030," June 2026.